Wednesday, 28 February 2018

Week 29 Reflection: Professional Online Social Networks

Activity 5: Using social online networks in teaching or professional development: Raising one’s head above the parapet.

Until now, my use of social media tools has been reluctant and limited to professional development. Why? The answer is a four letter word: fear.
In 2011/12, on a scholarship to Belgium I shared a blog with friends, colleagues and family but not my students. I now see that as somewhat bizarre as I am sure my students would have engaged in my journey and had lots of question to ask.  I have used excerpts from that blog with them but they lack the relative immediacy and excitement of connecting with someone in a different time and place. In April 2017, through professional development, I reluctantly joined Facebook. I have rarely used it since. Why not? Once again – fear - of someone mining my data.

Nevertheless, I belong to the English online forum, Secondary Literacy and nzaft websites. On these I have lurked: I have read most posts and occasionally participated in the discussion. Although Melhuish (2013) states ‘it would be a mistake to suggest [lurking] is non-learning’, she sees it as a challenge to determine the impact of professional development. However, links and ideas in others’ posts have given me resources and strategies that I may never have had otherwise.

Moreover, on this course, I have joined Google+ and participated in discussion – mostly because it was required as part of the course.
The main characteristics that I have harnessed are synchronous and asynchronous engagement – the latter allowing for reflection before posting.
 So, have I been disadvantaging my students by avoiding social media tools in my teaching?

The Constructivist theory of Vygotsky (1978) fits with social media in the opportunity it provides for creating knowledge.  Many teachers also support the use of social media. Teachers in the ‘Connected Educators’ video promoted the use of social media which they claimed was ‘transformative and powerful’. This is a claim borne out by Kathy Cassidy in her ‘Using social media in the classroom’ video. She has used blogging with her classes for the past three years: individual blogs become digital learning records; they also enable students to be connected to other classrooms, to compare and contrast ideas. Cassidy claims these connections have given her students a greater world view and developed their empathy. Social media tools can also personalise learning and put the learner in the driver’s seat (Melhuish, 2013) which therefore increases student agency.

Yet there is still some debate: Silius et al found that their research the student’s motivation for social media ca enhance their learning (2010). On the other hand, 56% respondent believe social media is more distracting than helpful (Seaman,Tinti-Kane 2013)  Potential problems also include: a lack of quality control, privacy/identity  issues and management of information (Greenhouse 2011).
As Melhuish notes, further research needs to be done in this area (2013). She sees the  challenge as ‘harnessing  their [social media’s] power in authentic learning experiences’. (Melhuish 2013 p36).


Now what?
Through reflecting on these readings and my learning through the Mindlab course, my fear has been somewhat assuaged. Although I am still wary of sites such as facebook, not only for privacy concerns but also because of the superficiality, I understand more of the benefits; for example, the connectivity and the ability to create knowledge. I better comprehend how to deal with privacy issues. Of most benefit to my students, is the potential of blogs both individual and collaborative, where they will have access to an authentic audience and diverse opinions. As part of the process, we will discuss netiquette and appropriate commenting.
For my own PD, I will join the VLN and challenge myself to interact more and keep my head above the parapet.


References
Melhuish, K.(2013). Online social networking and its impact on New Zealand educators’ professional learning. Master Thesis. The University of Waikato. Retrieved on 05 May, 2015 from http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/bitstream/han…
NZ Education Council. (n.d.). What is social media . Retrieved June 16, 2017 from http://teachersandsocialmedia.co.nz/what-social-me...
Seaman, J., & Tinti-Kane, H. (2013). Social media for teaching and learning. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/social-media-for-teaching-and-learning-2013-report.pdf
Silius, K., Miilumäki, T.,Huhtamäki, J.,Tebest, T., Meriläinen, J., & Pohjolainen, S.(2010) ‘Students’ motivations for social media enhanced studying and learning.’ Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 2, (1). Retrieved on 7th May,2015 from http://www.kmel-journal.org/ojs/index.php/online-p.

Tvo parents, Using social media in the classroom EdTED.com retrieved from: https://ed.ted.com/on/LY83ADUs

Week 28 Reflection: Influence of Law & Ethics in Practice


Activity 4: Legal and ethical contexts in my digital practice

 For this post, I will use Rolfe’s Reflective Cycle of ‘What? So what? Now what? ( as can be seen in the diagram, it neatly encapsulates Gibbs' version which I have used previously) to critique a situation that is based on a real life incident.



What was the ethical dilemma?

A Year 7 female student  took photos of  a sexual nature of herself on her phone and then sent these to her Year 7 boyfriend. He shared the sext with his friend who shared them with other students at school. The female student complained to school staff and her parents who threatened to take their daughter from the school if the boys were not suspended. One of the Year 7 boys involved has issues with truancy.


So what should we do - all things considered?

An analysis using Hall’s (2001)  model of ethical decision making:

The Stakeholders: School (Staff/Board/Principal), Parents, Students, Police (In this case although the original sharing of the sext was consensual, the sharing with others was not and this would constitute an offence).

The Priority stakeholders: The students as they are the most vulnerable. Under the Code of Professional Responsibility 2017, teachers have a commitment to learners to protect them from harm. The age of the students involved (11) is relevant as it is unlikely that they were unaware of the full impact of their actions.

What restrictions are there to your actions?:

Harmful Digital Communications Act: Students are 11 years old, too young to be prosecuted.
Restorative model - We are a restorative school so punitive action such as suspension as desired by the parents is not the first action. In this situation, it is  likely that the restorative methods may conflict with the parents’ beliefs and bias.
The school’s ICT policy is two sentences. Students sign a piece of paper saying they will uphold the school’s values of ‘Respect, Responsibility and Excellence’.


Which courses of action are possible?

  • Removal of images from digital device and report person/url to social networking sites if involved. Ministry guidelines support this.
  • Banning of digital device use by students involved. With the co-operation of the students’ parents, this is possible. However, as we are a 1:1 device school, the students may be disadvantaged by an ongoing ban of devices at school and at home.
  • Suspension - This would not be ideal for at least one of the students who has had issues with truancy.
  • Restorative Meeting with students and parents - essential as part of the restorative process. Helps everyone to be heard and for the instigators to understand the effects of their behaviour. Hopefully, everyone can then move forward.
  • Education of safe and  responsible social media use. Imperative!

How should this course of action be implemented?

Guidance Counsellor/Dean meet with students/whanau separately. Youth constable also meets. Restorative process explained to parents and students. Arrange a time to have a restorative meeting with all parties. Parties to agree on outcomes. Access to digital technology limited. Digital Safety Education given to  students involved and other students by homeroom teachers and digitech teachers.   Students involved to help create posters about cyberbullying. The well-being of students should be the priority.

Now what?  

Under the Code of Professional Responsibility teachers should promote the well-being of learners and protect them from harm.  From the Standards, Teachers should  ‘develop a culture that is focused on learning, and is characterised by respect, inclusion, empathy, collaboration and safety’(2017). Thus, I need to promote the safe and responsible use of digital technology and  help students to  avoid making themselves vulnerable online. I also need to  ensure students understand what our very general ICT policy actually means. 
Engaging parents/whanau in their children’s learning will be beneficial as they will be more aware of what their children are doing online.


References:
Connecticut’s Teachers Education and Mentoring Program. (2012). Ethical and Professional Dilemmas for Educators: Facilitator’s Guide: Understanding the Code of Professional Responsibility for Educators. Connecticut, US: Author. Retrieved from https://www.ctteam.org/df/resources/Module5Manual.pdf

*Hall, A. ( 2001). What ought I to do, all things considered? Paper presented at IIPE Conference held at the Key Centre for Ethics, Law, Justice and Governance,
Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Brisbane, 8 April 2001
University of Waikato. Hamilton: New Zealand. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gB3t_wBea_57afXbhkYBNwfSoFvBm9k_/view

Ehrich, L.C., Kimber m., Millwater, J. & Cranston, N. (2011). Ethical dilemmas: a model to understand teacher practice, Teachers and TEaching: theory and practice, 17:2, 173-185, DOI: 10.1080/13540602.2011.539794


Ministry of Education.(2015). DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY Safe and responsible use in schools. Wellington:New Zealand: Author. Retrieved from https://www.education.govt.nz/assets/Documents/School/Managing-and-supporting-students/DigitalTechnologySafeAndResponsibleUseinSchs.pdf

Ministry of Education (2015) Bullying Prevention and Response a guide for Schools. Wellington: New Zealand. Retrieved from:


Week 32: Changes in Practice and Future Plans

Activity 8: Changes in Practice and Future Plans The what: Identify one key change in your practice The main change is in the increa...